Editorial Process

Every educational page on WildRoot Health starts with an AI-assisted draft written by a Claude model. We are building a licensed-practitioner review panel; where a page carries a named reviewer, that reviewer's name appears on the page.

Where a page has been reviewed, the review is tied to a named practitioner whose name appears on that page. Practitioners joining our review panel will have their licences confirmed before they are added.

Clinical guidance changes. We are putting a scheduled review cycle in place so every educational page is revisited at least once a year, and we act immediately when reader feedback flags a potential inaccuracy.

We use Anthropic's Claude models to draft and update content at scale. We disclose AI assistance openly because our readers deserve to know how our content is made and who they're trusting.

If you spot something that looks wrong, outdated, or misleading on any page, please tell us. Every content page carries a 'Report an inaccuracy' link in the trust footer at the bottom. Your report goes directly to our editorial team, who will review it and follow up if we need more details. We take reader feedback seriously — it's one of the most reliable ways we catch mistakes.